BAILOUT what?

Posted on July 22, 2008. Filed under: Uncategorized |

I wish someone could help me understand why Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac stock prices are not hovering near zero. Is our governement really going to bail out equity investors in a failed business enterpriose? I totally get keeeping America afloat, but it is critical that failed businesses FAIL. They must FAIL. You can’t provide band-aids to equity failure. The whole system will come to a halt. Risk that pans out must result in failure. it is a crucial part of the system.

Make a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

6 Responses to “BAILOUT what?”

RSS Feed for abovethecrowd.com Comments RSS Feed

Kevin,

I still find it odd that the government is making the decision to leave equity holders with value when they are indeed the lender of last resort. I am pleased to see the shift to senior preferred stock + warrants. That makes way more sense than a loan.

Hi Bill, since this post there has been an unprecedented bail-out plan of US$700billion-plus. Would be interested to hear your views.
Kind regards
Kevin

The issue here is the equity holders. Sure, it might make sense for the companies to continue to operate. But should the owners (the stock holders) really get anything but sawdust.

Not only that. If the gov’t does bail them out then all SVP’s and above should give back any market-level compensation earned over the last 5 years. They’re working for a government institution, not a private company…

The short answer, as far as I can tell from here in the UK is that, yes, your government is going to rely on your US taxpayers to bail out both of them.

The answer to “why” is, as far as I can tell, that the danger to the short-term of letting the shock-waves wander through the system is currently “valued” more highly than the long-term moral hazard of allowing bankers to get away with ludicrous practices.

Makes you wonder about the valuation basis, doesn’t it 🙂

Here in the UK, these shareholder bailouts with public money tend only to come in the runups to elections.

would you have had bear sterans fail (rather than be bailed out in the form of a US Treasury guarantee to JP Morgan?)


Where's The Comment Form?

    About

    …focusing on the evolution and economics of high technology business and strategy. By day, I am a venture capitalist at Benchmark Capital.

    RSS

    Subscribe Via RSS

    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Add your feed to Newsburst from CNET News.com
    • Subscribe in Google Reader
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • The latest comments to all posts in RSS

    Meta

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...

%d bloggers like this: