My Life With Bing

Posted on April 19, 2012. Filed under: search, Uncategorized | Tags: , |

For the past two months, I changed the default search engine on my browser (ironically Chrome) from Google to Bing. I have used Bing almost exclusively for this period, and have two quick conclusions.

1) With regards to core search, the Bing results were perfectly fine. I never struggled to find anything. I never forced myself to redo the search on Google. So I would say Bing is on-par in terms of traditional, core search quality.

2) Where I did struggle was with the non-core search searches (i.e. maps, images, videos, news). Microsoft and Google use slightly different UIs on these non-core searches, and I had no idea how trained I was on the Google UI. Trying to learn the Bing tools and features was quite frustrating, and on those searches – I kept returning to Google. Plus, I didn’t realize how often I transition from one type of search to another (from core to maps, or core to news). This was another point of frustration. Keep in mind, I did not have a problem with Bing’s non-core results, just rather the navigational elements.

At the end of the day, for me, my user “lock-in” is associated not with the quality of Google results, but rather with the understanding of the UI features and levers.  More like a traditional software application.

Make a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

11 Responses to “My Life With Bing”

RSS Feed for Comments RSS Feed

Bing and Google are total different even in term of core-search when you have an Google account. Try for example some ambiguous term like “Orchard”. For my case, most interests are in computing field, so the top one would be the “Orchard” (same as Bing), but the next hits are total different. Bing presents anything indifferently it can pull in, Google on other hand offers digital marketing, hard supplier etc… only on the last line of the first page is here something about the Orchard hotel in Singapore, also very close to my usual interests. Of course, anything has two sides you can object, what if I want to search for some spots name Orchard instead? And yes, even Google can not read your mind (and nobody!), in such cases we can easy type in other searching terms like “Hotel” or “City” or simple “map”. And if you are looking for other heavily abused SEO terms like “free download” or slightly mistype your term, the search results are even more distinct.

so… umm, woudn’t be the first time M$ makes annoing, cumbersome UI.

The question is, why should I care?

Pretty happy every time I can avoid their products for lack of monopoly…

I’ve been doing the exact same thing with duckduckgo – 2nd month now.
..but I’ve hooked it into the address bar in chrome all my search from there now. Address bar also lets me flip back to google very easily as it has its own keyword that is used to instruct the browser which engine to use.
Duckduckgo is good.. but I occasionally find myself checking the results on google

Can’t believe you actually used Bing. I tried a similar experiment with duckduckgo, which isn’t quite as good as the multibillion dollar Bing or Google, but almost. And it’s made by just one guy… pretty impressive.

In my experience, Google does a better job finding the appropriate MS technical articles. I find that highly amusing.

Interesting. I recently changed from iPhone to Android (Samsung Galaxy). Like your experiense of the Bing/Google UI, I found the first six weeks with the Galaxy really frustrating. In that period, the first two weeks I just assumed the Android solution was almost hopeless. Nothing was logical and annoying little unexpected things would happen. Then I realised the problem was that the logic was different to the iPhone’s (not wrong, just different). I calmed down and learned how the Galaxy worked, and have become quite pleased with it now after six months.

During the learning period I definitiely would have changed back to iPhone if someone had handed me one. (Got to be a marketing opportunity there for the loosing manufacturer.) Now, I am not so sure.

Bing Maps (and Microsoft’s other non-core search products) are not simply less familiar, but poorly designed compared with Google’s. Further anecdotal support for the design as competitive advantage school.

Funny, I still use Yahoo maps for the same reason (with Bing getting 99% of my search traffic). I have a friend who uses mapquest of all things for the same reason.

Ok, gotta get back to this paper I’m writing on W*rdStar!


I had the same experience. The lock-in isn’t all that strong at this point on the basis of relatively light UI idiosyncracies — we’re not talking “switch from Excel to OpenOffice” type lock in. More like “switch from iOS to Android”

Where's The Comment Form?


    …focusing on the evolution and economics of high technology business and strategy. By day, I am a venture capitalist at Benchmark Capital.


    Subscribe Via RSS

    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Add your feed to Newsburst from CNET
    • Subscribe in Google Reader
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • The latest comments to all posts in RSS


Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...

%d bloggers like this: